Free CISI Combating Financial Crime mock exam
Sit the whole Combating Financial Crime paper: 50 questions running from money laundering to sanctions and risk management, under a 60-minute clock. Free, no sign-up, with a weighted score and an explanation for every answer.
What is on the CISI Combating Financial Crime mock exam?
One full Combating Financial Crime practice paper: 50 questions in 60 minutes, weighted across the eight syllabus elements exactly as the real paper is. Score 35 out of 50 to meet the 70% practice threshold, then review every answer one at a time.
- Questions
- 50 original practice questions
- Time
- 60 minutes
- Practice threshold
- 70%, which is 35 of 50
- Access
- Free, with no account or card
How the paper is weighted
Combating Financial Crime is a standalone Level 3 Award, and the same paper doubles as an Investment Operations Certificate technical unit and an optional unit of the Level 6 Diploma in Investment Compliance. Eight elements share 50 questions, which makes the weighting unusually uneven.
| Element | Questions |
|---|---|
| 1. The Background and Nature of Financial Crime | 7 |
| 2. Money Laundering | 8 |
| 3. Terrorist Financing | 3 |
| 4. Bribery and Corruption | 8 |
| 5. Fraud and Market Abuse | 4 |
| 6. Tax Evasion | 4 |
| 7. Economic Sanctions | 3 |
| 8. Financial Crime Risk Management | 13 |
| Total | 50 |
Financial Crime Risk Management is the heaviest element at thirteen of the 50 marks, more than a quarter of the paper on its own. Money Laundering and Bribery and Corruption are eight each and the background element is seven. Terrorist Financing and Economic Sanctions are three apiece.
For the cleanest rehearsal, set aside the full 60 minutes, avoid notes and answer every question. There is no negative marking on the real paper, so a guess is always better than a blank. The mock hides feedback until submission and warns you before handing in a paper with blanks.
Full practice paper
50 questions. 60 minutes. No sign-up.
Sit the paper in one go if you can. Answers and explanations stay hidden until you submit, so the score is a more useful rehearsal than an instant-feedback quiz.
The timer starts when you press the button. Reloading or leaving the page ends this sitting.
Sample Combating Financial Crime questions, with answers
8 questions at the standard of the paper above, weighted towards the elements that carry the most marks. Pick an answer to see whether you were right and why. None of these appear in the timed mock, so working through them first costs you nothing when you sit it.
Any firm must take financial crime risk into account in each of the following routine activities, with one exception, which is:
Not quite. The answer is D.
Money laundering and other financial crime risk has to be built into day-to-day operations, and the syllabus names three moments in particular: new product development, customer take-on and changes in the business profile. Dividend policy is a capital and shareholder question that sits outside this list. The three named points matter because they are precisely where a firm's exposure changes, so controls reviewed only on an annual cycle will always lag the business.
Since 2020, staff of the International Monetary Fund have taken part in assessments carried out by:
Not quite. The answer is D.
IMF staff have participated since 2020 in the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist-financing assessments run by other assessor bodies, the FATF-style regional bodies among them, and the Fund also cooperates on peer evaluations, technical assistance and policy development. Regulators authorising banks is the strongest distractor. Authorisation is a supervisory function, not assessment work, and the IMF has no part in it. Maintaining designation lists and investigating offences sit with sanctions authorities and law enforcement respectively.
What additional products must financial crime controls cover following an update to the UK Money Laundering Regulations 2017?
Not quite. The answer is B.
The regulations were amended to bring cryptoassets and prepayment cards within the anti-money laundering perimeter, closing two channels that allowed value to move with little identification. Insurance products are the closest distractor because life policies have long been recognised as a laundering vehicle, but they were already covered as regulated products, so no extension was needed for them.
For the Bribery Act 2010 corporate offence, which of the following is the decisive feature of an associated person?
Not quite. The answer is B.
The corporate offence reaches bribery by anyone associated with the organisation who bribes on its behalf, and employees, agents and other representatives are all named to make the breadth plain. Confining it to payroll employees is the closest wrong answer and the most dangerous one commercially, because agents and intermediaries are where this risk usually sits. Shareholding and board membership describe ownership and governance, neither of which is the same as performing services for the organisation.
Malicious software that locks a victim's computer until a payment is made to the criminal is known as:
Not quite. The answer is D.
Ransomware, also described as file hijacking, denies the victim the use of their own machine or files until a ransom is paid, and it is the form of malware most often associated with crypto asset payments. A denial of service attack is the closest neighbour because it also denies access, but it does so by making a website unreachable from outside rather than by locking the victim's own device. Key logging and the ad-clicker steal information rather than extort payment.
Each statement about the 2017 amendment to POCA is accurate EXCEPT:
Not quite. The answer is B.
The corporate offence does not transfer the client's tax debt: the tax stays owed by the taxpayer to the revenue authority, and confusing the firm's criminal exposure with the client's bill is the classic error. The 2017 Act grafts two further offences onto POCA rather than replacing it, so the established offences survive intact, which is why concealing and tipping off, and equally acquisition and failure to disclose, all remain fully in force. A relevant body convicted of the new offence is liable to an unlimited fine, so the statement about the penalty is accurate as well.
Confiscation is separated from an asset freeze over a designated person's funds by:
Not quite. The answer is A.
A freeze prevents the use and the movement of the money and leaves it immobilised where it sits, for as long as the designation lasts. Ownership does not change. This is what separates a freeze from confiscation, and it is why funds can be released intact if a designation is later lifted.
Before a relationship begins, the country risk factor weighed is:
Not quite. The answer is B.
Country risk before onboarding asks where the customer is based, where its business is conducted and through which jurisdictions its funds are routed, and whether the firm can deliver the extra diligence a weak jurisdiction makes necessary. A product's appeal to an age group is the strongest distractor because it reads like a customer characteristic. It is a commercial question owed to the customer rather than one asked about the customer, and it measures no exposure to crime at all.
Where the marks go on this paper
The last element decides this paper. Financial Crime Risk Management is thirteen marks on customer due diligence, enhanced due diligence, the risk-based approach, the MLRO role, suspicious activity reporting, training and record keeping. It also sits at the end of the workbook, which is exactly where revision energy runs out.
Money Laundering is eight marks and the three stages are the classic trap. Placement, layering and integration are easy to recite and harder to apply when a question describes a specific transaction and asks which stage it represents.
Bribery and Corruption is another eight marks and turns on the UK Bribery Act offences, the adequate procedures defence and how facilitation payments are treated differently in different jurisdictions. The commonest error is assuming the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act works the same way.
Terrorist Financing, Economic Sanctions and Fraud and Market Abuse are small elements that look skippable at three or four marks each. They are eleven marks together, which on a 50-question paper is 22%.
How to use your result
Treat 70% as a practice threshold, not a readiness promise. A stronger signal is a run of timed scores above the threshold with no element repeatedly falling behind. On a 50-question paper each question is two percentage points, so the short elements are worth more than they feel. If Financial Crime Risk Management is below 70% the total will usually follow, since it is over a quarter of the paper.
Use the answer review to understand each miss, then revisit the relevant part of the Combating Financial Crime exam guide. To drill a single topic rather than sit a whole paper, start with the free Combating Financial Crime practice questions.
Looking for official material? Combating Financial Crime past papers: what actually exists explains what CISI actually publishes and how to combine it with question practice. For more full papers, see the paid plans, from £59.
Independent practice material: PasskeyPrep is not affiliated with, endorsed by or accredited by the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment. These questions were written independently against the syllabus. They are not copied from a live CISI exam or official past paper.
Frequently asked questions
Is this Combating Financial Crime mock exam really free?
Yes. All 50 questions are free, with no account, email address or card. Submit and you get a weighted score, an eight-element breakdown and an explanation for every answer.
Does this mock match the real CFC exam format?
It uses 50 questions, a 60-minute timer, a 70% practice threshold and the published weightings across the eight syllabus elements. The questions are original PasskeyPrep practice material, not the CISI examination platform or official exam questions.
Is Combating Financial Crime an Award or a Certificate?
The exam earns the standalone Level 3 Award in Combating Financial Crime. It also counts as an Investment Operations Certificate technical unit and as an optional unit of the Level 6 Diploma in Investment Compliance.
How is it different from Global Financial Compliance?
Combating Financial Crime is a 50-question paper devoted entirely to financial crime. Global Financial Compliance is a 100-question paper in which financial crime is one element of five, alongside international regulation, the compliance function, ethics and governance.